Appearing on television on March 7, Michelle Bachman has revealed that the federal medical fascism law has WITHIN IT requirements that AUTOMATICALLY FUND HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS, regardless of whether the plan is "defunded" by a future Congress. This stunning news also includes the revelation that the law also gives the SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES UNLIMITED power to appropriate money, regardless of whether a new bill has been passed to do so. UNLIMITED.

We will expand out analysis of this in audio soon, to spread the word to audio subscribers.

Please visit this page for more information:

http://bachmann.house.gov/News/DocumentSingle.aspx?DocumentID=227338

It would be better to have the Rep file a bill stating that any private airport operator or priate airline operator who wishes to NOT conform to fed rules will not be prosecuted or arrested by any Texas government official, and that the government of Texas will resist with armed force any attempt by the federal government to impose it's unconstitutional rules on any airline or airport in Texas, but this is a nice touch.

http://www.lonestarreport.org/Blog/tabid/65/EntryId/1022/Simpson-files-a...

A-member how we said in our audios that if the federal gubment can claim that it has a place to 'provide security' in airports, because planes go over state borders, they will use the same rationale for roads and trains?

Yeah, they'd already planned that, and didn't tell anyone...

Check this out:

http://blogs.forbes.com/andygreenberg/2011/03/02/docs-reveal-tsa-plan-to...

Nothin' like that Fourth Amendment, huh?

Be Seeing You!

You know, the one that leftists used to justifiably slam George Bush? Yeah, the one that allows the feds to breach the Constitution with unwarranted wiretaps, invasion of financial records, and other nice things like that? Yeah, that one. Despire the fact that Barack Obama OPPOSED this when he was trying to garner votes in the presidential race, he now goes with it. Anyone shocked?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/25/AR201102...

Oh, and remember, the lefties want the internet KILL SWITCH, just in case people in the US get uppity like the media savvy, media connected protesters in Egypt and Libya.

Be Seeing You!

NICE!

Would enjoy seeing more of this.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/02/23/seattle-restaurant-puts-tsa-workers-on-no-eat-list/

Be Seeing You!

And get this, the statists say that a new provision prohibiting ANY legal recourse to Executive branch action is GREAT!

WHAT?

And they want you to know that, in the event that bad elements might SHUT DOWN THE WEB, the PRESIDENT WILL HAVE THE POWER TO... SHUT DOWN THE INTERNET!

Check it out!

http://libertyconspiracy.podomatic.com/entry/2011-01-24T17_41_04-08_00

These peopl

Yeah, there's nothing like encountering another story about how gubment blocks charitable, voluntary interaction.

We all know the old argument. "Ahh," say the bureaucrats and politicians. "But you see, the homeless aren't 'protected' from being fed food prepared by 'licensed' food preparers."

"Why don't you leave to their own devices the poor people who want help?" you might ask.

"Oh, no! We can't do that! People in need who are offered help are incapable of deciding for themselves, and we just can't trust free people to make safe food, either."

"So you're saying that individuals are too daft to make their own decisions about the relative risks and benefits involved with an action?"

"Yep," say the gubment folks.

Nothing like a justice system, huh?

So, the state says your child MUST be 'educated' according to state standards, the state fails to educate huge percentages of the kids, the costs go up, citizens are forced to pay whether they have kids or not, and then, if the kids who are stuck in the system have a problem with a school, they're folks are FINED, without a judicial avenue of recourse.

Interesting.

http://dfw.cbslocal.com/2011/01/12/schools-giving-tickets-not-detention-...

Be Seeing You!

What a surprise. And so constitutional. The power to do it is right there, in Article...

Uh.

Well, anyway, enjoy the internet. And remember, the GUBMENT can always make something better than the competitive marketplace trying to fulfill customer desires. Yeah, that's it...

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20027837-501465.html

Oh, and it will be "easier", too! And we're all SURE that privacy groups will love it...

Incredible.

If you've listened to our 12-22-10 and 12-24-10 programs, you know about some of this. And you can compare her claims to the actual audio of things like the ABC interview with the "Big Three" Security bozos.

Wouldn't it be nice to invite Ms. Homeland Tsarista to a public debate about the Constitutionality of the department and the TSA?

Yeah, it sure would.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9KBLAKO0&show_article=1

Be Seeing You...

And how many "Constitutional Conservatives" are aware that the determination of who can be on the soil of a state is, according to the US Constitution, up to the STATES?

That's okay, we should just follow their lead and federalize everything, create one massive police state, prohibit employers from hiring whom they want, invade their workplaces, require work papers for all Americans, require ID papers at unannounced federal stops anywhere the feds please and fine or imprison people for hiring "illegals".

Nothing like the land of the free...

http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2010/12/hernandez_rojas_die...

Be Seeing You!

Yeah, lots of questions on this one, like um... Fourth Amendment, Due Process, fascism, false claims of "security provided by YOUR TSA" and the one we've been asking all along: Can ANYONE in the pop media speak out against the false paradigm of federal regulation of air routes and airlines? Anyone?

The only people to do this very important task on major network TV have been Judge Andrew Napolitano and John Stossell.

It's up to the rest of us in the Conspriacy (linked here or through other libertarian sites) to spread the word.

Here's the link:

http://www.news10.net/news/article.aspx?storyid=113529&provider=top&cati...

Be Seeing You!

This 56 year old woman has a heart device and is a rape victim. But hey, better to destroy her due process rights and her rights that are protected under the 4th Amendement, right?

http://www.kvue.com/news/local/Woman-arrested-at-ABIA-after-refusing-enh...

Happy Travels! Remember, you have that supposed "option" and the law is the law.

As one woman said, "for our protection, I don't have a problem with it."

Do you think the TSA will release the video of this event?

Be Seeing You!

But it's all done PRIOR to the actual trial, so instead of the defendant getting off completely, the prosecutor goes and works out a plea deal.

At least it's progress! Perhaps more jurors in victimless crime trials will follow this example!

http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/article_d6b1a...

Be Seeing You!

This looks like another false flag put out at juuuuuust the same time that the feds will be voting ot give the FDA sweeping powers over food. s510 passed a few weeks ago, but was turned back on a technicality. Now, they're trying to push for the same regs all over again.

Great comments beneath the article. And note: Even if there IS a plot to poison foods, who best can handle it, one centralized bureaucracy for an ENTIRE nation, or the people on hand, working in the free market. AND, what could EVER inspire people to want ot KILL American civilians?

They hate the "debased American culture"? Funny, the murderers of 911 went ot strip clubs the night before the attacks. Guess they didn't mind American culture too much, did they?

And it seems that certain vested interests in the telecom industry have agreed to back the new rules, because they get special favors to help exclude copetition.

http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2010/12/exclusive-fccs-dems-nar...

Be Seeing You!

Why has it been so difficult for pop media outlets to understand that the imposition of political mandates on market structures will inhibit their growth, innovation and price decreases over time thanks to productivity gains?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870339520457602345225074854...

Be Seeing You!

Let's compare the private individuals the feds want to coerce to the government agents. Those police officers who have to make calls and look up license plate numbers on computers while they're moving... Maybe they should be required to bring their cars to complete stops when using anything that might take their eyes off the roads.

And god forbid someone actually turn on his radio or glance at scenery.

Gee, who would have EVER expected a bunch of statists to propose a world-wide system of control over the greatest means of free expression since moveable type?

http://www.itnews.com.au/News/242051,un-mulls-internet-regulation-option...

Be Seeing You!

No kidding! This is just like a report that Brian Ross' team did TWO years ago. Nothing's changed. Would you like to hire a BETTER group to provide security, perhaps one that didn't have to abide by all the federal bureaucratic nonsense? Sorry, no can do. You get either the TSA or one of five companies the FEDS will let you approach. No such thing as a competitive marketplace for airline security, despite the fact that what is happening is a PRIVATE transaction between you and the airline and the federal government is not constitutionally sanctioned to be involved.

Enjoy your holiday traveling!