As we have noted numerous times, there is no immigration-control power granted to the US Congress. Writing rules for naturalization is a power granted to Congress, but not immigration. The only reference to regulating the "importation of persons" in the Constitution refers to the importation of slaves (a horrid practice), and it pertained only to the first thirteen states. If you read "Live Free or Die", you'll find a lerge section of the book devoted to this issue, and to the economic benefits of immigrants coming to the US.

Here is the story. We might discuss this Sunday night on Liberty Conspiracy Radio. Join the Conspiracy at 10:06, thru Midnight, Sun to Thursday!

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/stolen-babies-mother-loses-kids/story?id=1...

Not as if the UN isn't ALREADY funded through taxation of all the "members"... Enjoy!

http://www.infowars.com/un-wants-world-tax-to-help-the-poor/

Be Seeing You!

We'll look at this on Liberty Conspiracy radio, tonight, beginning at 10:06 pm US eastern time!

http://www.cnn.com/2012/02/01/health/opinion-regulate-sugar-alcohol/inde...

Be Seeing You!

This shouldn't really come as a surprise, given all the things the feds claim to have the power to "regulate"... Let's look at that term tonight on the Libety Conspiracy Audio Live...

http://www.anh-usa.org/fda-new-claim-body-is-a-drug/

Be Seeing You!

This ties-in to our radio discussion about private property, private business, and discrimination. We'll discuss it again tonight on Liberty Conspiracy Radio, between 10:06 and midnight eastern US time!

http://blog.timesunion.com/tablehopping/28682/restaurant-boots-tennessee...

Be Seeing You!

There once was a time when armed thugs paid by theft weren't employed at border points to harrass people and take away their liberty and property. That time is long, long gone. This is only the beginning. It is going to get much worse.

Read this story, and try not to think, "You gotta be kidding me."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2093796/British-tourists-arreste...

Be Seeing You!

The presence of the TSA in the airports is unconstitutional and presents a false dichotomy, a false choice of a pat down or a scan -- both being infringements of the 4th Amendment. They claim that by wanting to get on a plane, you willingly give up your rights against unWARRANTED searches and seizures. They claim that the federal government has jurisdiction over air travel (false). They "run the airways", so you must submit to their demands if you want to fly.

It's all in the guise of "copyright protection", but, as usual, the government cannot try to "protect rights" without first iolating them. In trying to enforce its arbitrary and fluctuating 'copyright laws', the feds plan on invading private property, shutting down businesses without trial, and prompting parent companies to shut down sites without checking.

We have posted more detailed information previously, but here is the new report:

http://www.mercurynews.com/news/ci_19761719

Be Seeing You!

So it's come to this. And people in the area STILL don't get it. They think it's just a policy that needs some refining... How about looking at the root cause of the problem, which is that this is a GOVERNMENT system, and it cannot satisfy everyone's interests? Do some people want to combat what they see as a danger of "childhood obesity"? Perhaps they think this towering infringement on civil liberties is a good idea. Perhaps others, who still have their tax dollars taken by the government, believe otherwise...

Neither side seems capable of seeing that it is the machinery of government which is pitting them against each other.

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/schools_spy_on_fat_kids_HpPAgsKXPYjt1...

Ahh, biofuels... Those wonderful things that screw up engines, increase prices and give politicians thrills of joy -- even while they make certain special interests even more wealthy...

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/10/business/energy-environment/companies-...

Be Seeing You!

As we've often mentioned, the further people allow the state (in the generic sense) to build its welfare state and "provide" so-called services, the more their rights will be attenuated. Government can only exist by infringing on property rights, and any time it operates, it cannot do so without "managing away" more rights, like free speech, journalism, gun rights, privacy, etc.

Take a look at this:

http://www.infowars.com/dhs-officers-armed-with-semiautomatics-set-up-un...

Be Seeing You!

As we try to stress, employing a government/state paradigm to try to solve issues of copyright and patent protection inevitably leads to a one-size-fits-all, top-down system that crushes free communication and market exchange. A voluntary system would work better. But for more than two centuries, the US and other western nations have not allowed for that kind of a system.

One doesn't need government to establish systems of property rights, market exchange, and property rights protections.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70878.html

Be Seeing You!

Bus stations, train stations. At least now protestors will be able to make appearances, so that the police and TSA can arrest them for noting the brazen unconstitutionality of the Homeland Security Agengy.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-terror-checkpoints-...

Be Seeing You!

One wonders which is more vexing, the fact that the reporter parrots the opening of the press release from the sponsors, who claim that the legislation "stops short of mandating new security standards for sectors deemed critical to national security", only to report that the legislation would require "DHS to evaluate cybersecurity risks for critical infrastructure firms and determine the best way to mitigate them."

If one translates that last, beautifully ambiguous statement into prectical government terminology, it means that the DHS can get access to the servers and data of any firm it deems a part of "critical infrastructure", and then order the company owners to take actions the DHS wants them to take, including shutting down.

The National "Defense" Authorization Act has passed its Senate-House Reconciliation.
It allows the Defense Dept and White House to imprison US citizens and non-US citizens INDEFINITELY, WITHOUT HABEAS HEARINGS (in the Constitution, only Congress can lift the Writ of Habeas, and only at times of rebellion or insurrection)...

This amazing little article reveals a couple things. First, the "powers that be" in Broward County would be fine with the rights protected by the 2nd and 4th Amendments being attacked, as long as the radiation level was low.

Second, as the last line of the article indicates, this "ban" is all show... The TSA is the final decider. So this move by Broward County is merely rhetorical, kind of like having a cop watch and vocally protest as you're mugged, but not do his job, which is to stop the molestation.

http://miami.cbslocal.com/2011/12/13/broward-considers-airport-body-scan...

Be Seeing You!

But remember, the TSA is "following proper procedure". Keep following orders, thugs, your brown shirts are in the mail.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/lenore-zimmerman-85-hurt-strip-...

Be Seeing You!

This is an excellent example of how pop media sources often miss the forest for the trees. As you read this piece, you will probably note the acknowledgment of absurdity the authors offer. Clearly, based on the way the story is structured and the interviews conducted, the authors don't much care for this silly edict. But what is the basis of their dislike? It is the fact that they have differing opinions, and think it counter-productive and silly for EU gubment agents to claim something that runs so counter to what they, the authors, and many others know: drinking water DOES hydrate the body.

What is MISSED here is the larger question, which can be set up thus;

Ahh, but if you ask Elizabeth Warren, we ALL need to pay into this system. It's a "good"! ;)

http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/teacher-caught-tape-bullying-student-ca...

Be Seeing You!

It might pass the Senate, but the President will try to veto it. If they override his veto, then he will simply not enforce the law if states don't provide reciprocity. But still, this is a good sign of how many people view gun rights as universal. What it also shows, however, is a profound LACK OF UNSERSTANDING of the US CONSTITUTION.

First, the Second Amendment is clear, and is supposed to STOP states from interfering with HOW one carries his weapon of self-defense. No state is supposed to have "licenses" to "let you" carry a gun, concealed or otherwise.