What a surprise. And so constitutional. The power to do it is right there, in Article...

Uh.

Well, anyway, enjoy the internet. And remember, the GUBMENT can always make something better than the competitive marketplace trying to fulfill customer desires. Yeah, that's it...

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20027837-501465.html

Oh, and it will be "easier", too! And we're all SURE that privacy groups will love it...

Incredible.

And as the buying power of the dollar drops even more, we will see the price of oil rise even higher, which will, in turn will put upward pressure on the prices of pretty much everything...

Enjoy!

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297020420400457605045169685978...

Be Seeing You!

Hey, FORMER Senatore Gregg, how's that TARP doing for ya?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/28/AR2010122803649.html

Oh, and 98 more of the TRAP, uh, we mean TARP recipient banks are on the verve of insolvency, Juddy; thought you'd like to know.

Be Seeing You!

If you've listened to our 12-22-10 and 12-24-10 programs, you know about some of this. And you can compare her claims to the actual audio of things like the ABC interview with the "Big Three" Security bozos.

Wouldn't it be nice to invite Ms. Homeland Tsarista to a public debate about the Constitutionality of the department and the TSA?

Yeah, it sure would.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D9KBLAKO0&show_article=1

Be Seeing You...

Despite the fact that the sham they now call "Climate Change" used to be called anthropogenic "Global Warming" until some scientists began to explode the myth, these bureaucrats are scrambling to impose more costs on those who provide energy to us, with no real change for cleaner air, and with not even a nod to the Constitution.

Check out this piece, if you can stand the back-and-forth way the author keeps bouncing away from the main topic to talk about others. Ugh!

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gRb2CA1DnQdPvlWmI5ADfj...

Be Seeing You!

And how many "Constitutional Conservatives" are aware that the determination of who can be on the soil of a state is, according to the US Constitution, up to the STATES?

That's okay, we should just follow their lead and federalize everything, create one massive police state, prohibit employers from hiring whom they want, invade their workplaces, require work papers for all Americans, require ID papers at unannounced federal stops anywhere the feds please and fine or imprison people for hiring "illegals".

Nothing like the land of the free...

http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2010/12/hernandez_rojas_die...

Be Seeing You!

Yeah, lots of questions on this one, like um... Fourth Amendment, Due Process, fascism, false claims of "security provided by YOUR TSA" and the one we've been asking all along: Can ANYONE in the pop media speak out against the false paradigm of federal regulation of air routes and airlines? Anyone?

The only people to do this very important task on major network TV have been Judge Andrew Napolitano and John Stossell.

It's up to the rest of us in the Conspriacy (linked here or through other libertarian sites) to spread the word.

Here's the link:

http://www.news10.net/news/article.aspx?storyid=113529&provider=top&cati...

Be Seeing You!

This 56 year old woman has a heart device and is a rape victim. But hey, better to destroy her due process rights and her rights that are protected under the 4th Amendement, right?

http://www.kvue.com/news/local/Woman-arrested-at-ABIA-after-refusing-enh...

Happy Travels! Remember, you have that supposed "option" and the law is the law.

As one woman said, "for our protection, I don't have a problem with it."

Do you think the TSA will release the video of this event?

Be Seeing You!

Including entrapment, illegal wiretapping, unconstitutional monitoring of money transfers, and, of course, continuing to inspire more and more terrorists by using the US military to kill civilians abroad in an unconstitutional military action.

But remember, it's the American citizens who somehow "become radicalized"... Why would that suddnely happen? Strange, huh?

Check out this ABC fluff piece on Eric Holder, and beware, the video begins automatically!

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/attorney-general-eric-holders-blunt-warni...

Be Seeing You!

This looks like another false flag put out at juuuuuust the same time that the feds will be voting ot give the FDA sweeping powers over food. s510 passed a few weeks ago, but was turned back on a technicality. Now, they're trying to push for the same regs all over again.

Great comments beneath the article. And note: Even if there IS a plot to poison foods, who best can handle it, one centralized bureaucracy for an ENTIRE nation, or the people on hand, working in the free market. AND, what could EVER inspire people to want ot KILL American civilians?

They hate the "debased American culture"? Funny, the murderers of 911 went ot strip clubs the night before the attacks. Guess they didn't mind American culture too much, did they?

And it seems that certain vested interests in the telecom industry have agreed to back the new rules, because they get special favors to help exclude copetition.

http://techdailydose.nationaljournal.com/2010/12/exclusive-fccs-dems-nar...

Be Seeing You!

Why has it been so difficult for pop media outlets to understand that the imposition of political mandates on market structures will inhibit their growth, innovation and price decreases over time thanks to productivity gains?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870339520457602345225074854...

Be Seeing You!

Let's compare the private individuals the feds want to coerce to the government agents. Those police officers who have to make calls and look up license plate numbers on computers while they're moving... Maybe they should be required to bring their cars to complete stops when using anything that might take their eyes off the roads.

And god forbid someone actually turn on his radio or glance at scenery.

No kidding! This is just like a report that Brian Ross' team did TWO years ago. Nothing's changed. Would you like to hire a BETTER group to provide security, perhaps one that didn't have to abide by all the federal bureaucratic nonsense? Sorry, no can do. You get either the TSA or one of five companies the FEDS will let you approach. No such thing as a competitive marketplace for airline security, despite the fact that what is happening is a PRIVATE transaction between you and the airline and the federal government is not constitutionally sanctioned to be involved.

Enjoy your holiday traveling!

As we like to stress to statists who have no clue about the causes of inflation or how the gubment tries to hide price increases in the CPI by removing food and fuel prices from the calculations, the increase in the MONEY SUPPLY is the inflation, causing a decrease in teh buying power of each unit of money as that liquidity moves through the system from the large banks to the little guy trying to keep his job. Once the little guy recognizes that prices are wayyyy up for things (oh, like, un... FOOD) he will begin to cut back on his spending, causing sellers to be stuck with new inventory they bought on the expectation of more sales. This leads to cut-backs in employment and orders for more goods, which causes more job loss systemically.

Yep. The move by the Dems in DC to try to pass ANOTHER spending bill before many have to vacate their offices? It failed. So now we only have the 3.5 TRILLION or more that's been wasted since the last year of Bush AND all the other waste in the first three years and then there's Clinton, and then...

Nothing like having the freedom to choose what to do with your own earnings and make decisions based on your own morals, huh?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/40710315/ns/politics-capitol_hill

Be Seeing You!

In this piece, you'll read the arguments of MD Sineater Bennie Cardin, as he equates one unjustified rational for government actions (the fact that governments have taken over the roads since the mid-1800's) to pushing for government actions regarding "security" in the interwebs.

http://www.infosecurity-us.com/view/14579/senate-bill-would-require-mini...

Not only is it unconstitutional, not only does it not allow individuals and owners of businesses to make up their own minds about how many resources they want to devote to internet security, it presupposes that the government will be MORE secure than private industry. Does anyone believe that?

But its interesting, this guy offers great comments about the federal gubment FORCING individuals to have to buy something. But he lets slide the JUST-AS-UNCONSTITUTIONAL idea that the feds can tell a business owner WHAT HE HAS TO SELL.

Only when we see gubment-types recognizing the primacy of individual choice which is at the heart of all free market transactions will this kind of double standard (evven within a ruling which will be applauded by many) eliminated.

Check it out, Strongbad!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101213/ap_on_re_us/us_health_care_overhaul_...

Be Seeing You!

Not only is the "Healthy Hunger-free Kids Act" blindingly unconstitutional, it's a great example of paternalism at its most rhetorically hilarious. Check out this quote by the Secretary of Agriculture (again, an unconstitutional position) about th eimposition of federal food rules on local schools:

"To ensure that these efforts are not undermined by foods from vending machines, a la carte lunch lines, and school stores, USDA will help make the healthy choice an easy choice for our kids by setting nutritional standards for all food sold in schools."

This one is not only unconstitutional, it's a totally useless effort -- unless the intent is to track law-abiding people and make them caugh up more cash every few years, broadening the creep of the FAA.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101210/ap_on_bi_ge/us_misplaced_planes

Be Seeing You!