The best in North America. One of the best in the world, hands down.

www.dankojones.com

Go get 'em, Danko.

Opening up a dialogue about practicality versus principle, and how the fonders allowed for changes in the US Constitution if they had made mistakes.

Compact Disc

One should not be surprised by the levels to which some will stoop to try to convince Americans that it is alright to disregard the US Constitution. The trouble is, it is being done by members of the executive branch, the leglislative branch, and the judicial branch of the US government.

Compact Disc

There is a great deal of information to cover, because there are a great many lies and/or mistakes one can attribute to Attorney General Gonzales.

Compact Disc

There is much to discuss.

Compact Disc

One of the best garage bands out there.

Intellectual corruption is not a trait one should have to witness in a bureaucrat or politician. It is, however, very prevalent.

Case in point: Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, a cynical and deceptive mouthpiece for an increasingly cynical and deceptive administration.

Compact Disc

Gardner and Phyllis conclude their discussion, and agree to disagree on a few points.

On February 7, 2006, Gardner Goldsmith welcomed to his program Phyllis Schlaffley, founder of Eagle Forum, and author of "The Supremecists". Phyllis discussed her recent article in Human Events, outlining the fissure opening in the Republican Party over immigration control. This is part one of two.

As many know, the Kelo v. New London decision widened the capacity of government to take private land through eminent domain. We at the Conspiracy believe the clause written into the US Constitution providing for eminent domain seizure for "public use" was a blunder by the Founders. It has always been open to a wider enterpretation, moving into "public good", and supporting seizure to allow for private development. With this seizure and development, politicians can claim that the increased tax revenues will eventually be used for the "public good", and thus the action is, according to them, perfectly legitimate.

Denis Goddard has recently created one of the best sites in NH to obtain up-to-date information from some of the state's great pro-freedom thinkers. The Conspiracy is proud to team up with www.freestateblogs.net in an exchange of written and recorded opinions and information. Please visit them frequently, and feel free to pass on our compliments from LibertyConspiracy.com.

Sam Cohen, one of the standout defenders of freedom in New Hampshire, recently posted an excellent piece at www.freestateblogs.net. In it, he answers many frequently asked questions from people interested in NH gun laws.

Here is the opening of his piece. You may follow the link to read the entire article:

Frequently Asked Questions about New Hampshire Gun Laws

Copyright © 2006 Sam Cohen

Since June of 2002, I’ve been the volunteer who receives and returns messages to the GO-Phone, the voicemail message service of Gun Owners of New Hampshire: (603) 225-GONH (225-4664). The most common calls are questions about New Hampshire gun laws, often asked by people thinking about moving here from other states. I particularly enjoy talking to people from our neighboring state to the south, because if it’s the first time they learn about our freedoms compared with the government restrictions in Massachusetts, they’re like kids opening Christmas presents.

Number 16 has brought to light a resolution proposed by some of NH's best legislators. It is called HCR (Concurrent Resolution) 25, and it deserves support. It would express the desire of the NH Legislature for the United States to withdraw from the UN, if the UN adopted any policies that contravened the US Constitution.

Since the funding of the UN is unconstitutional in itself, this would let the NH Legislature make its request very quickly after passage. Here is the text, with ratings provided by the NH Liberty Alliance (www.nhliberty.org):
HCR 25 – AS INTRODUCED

2006 SESSION

06-2336

The Conspirator known as Number 16 would like the other members of the Conspiracy to be aware of a dangerous and unconstitutional bill currently slithering through the NH State House. It is HB 1714 - FN. The information on it, as provieded by the NH Liberty Alliance and General Court websites, indicates that it would require all doctors prescribing "addictive" controlled substances, and all pharmacies selling them, to electronically report the prescriptions and sales to the state of NH within fifteen days of the last day of the month.

In addition to contravening Section Two, Article 83, of the NH Constitution, this bill stands against the presumption of innocence, and the US Constitution's proscription against unreasonable searches and seizures. The text of the bill is herein offered with NH Liberty Alliance Ratings of its sponsors, available at www.nhliberty.org:

Firefly - The Complete Series asin: B0000AQS0F binding: DVD list price: $49.98 USD amazon price: $36.49 USD

"Take my love, take my land, take me where I cannot stand. But I don't care--I'm still free. You can't take the skies from me..."

Despite the network's attempts to kill this show thru bad scheduling, Firefly lives on.

A fun romp in the future, and liberty ideals abound.

This week saw George Bush give his State of the Union speech. In it he mispronounced "nuclear" at least four times, and said that by 2030, nearly 60% of the federal budget will be eaten up by "entitlements" such as Social Security and Medicare. Calling for fiscal responsibility, he said that something has to be done about this problem.

Does anyone recall the $800+ billion (in just ten years) liability he pushed through Congress two years ago, otherwise known as the Prescription Drug Benefit, or "Medicare part D"? Does anyone recall how his Congressmen and Senators voted on this patently unconstitutional program? Interesting questions to consider as one listens to the President.

One of the priciples President Bush often lauds is "democracy". He believes democracy stops tyrrany. The Founding Fathers knew better.

As a diversion from the political world, enjoy this discussion about the Oscars, and the surprise call "Against the Grain" received just before the close of the day's program. A real treat!

With EL G Grande, of "Against the Grain", and Wendy Wang, of Talk Radio News

on Januray 31, 2006, State Senator Lou D'Allesandro joined Gardner Goldsmith to discuss the "cuts" (you know, the 7.3% increase, rather than the proposed 7.5% increase) in federal funding for welfare programs.

Their conversation led to an analysis of the ethics of redistribution of wealth, and the claims by leftists that the "rich don't pay their fair share". Lou was a good sport in the conversation.

Economics in One Lesson: The Shortest and Surest Way to Understand Basic Economics