As the people who wrote the rules for the operation of the US government would have observed, any government constraints on the ownership of firearms is unconstitutional.

Now, we all know that the Constitution hasn't fared well in holding back the intrusions of government into the lives of individuals, and even though this ruling looks to uphold the tradition of the writers of the document, it's another example of how contemporary figures shave the explicit wording of the Founders to fit their own political/ideological agendas.

As you will see, the Court left 'room' for 'sensible' regulations on a supposed right. How one can logically place limitations on something that, by definition, is supposed to stand apart from government regulation, well, that's difficult to figure, isn't it?

Here is the report:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37972148/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/?GT1=43...

Be Seeing You!