The Bush Administration has told us for over a year that its "detainees" were being treated according to the Geneva Conventions.

If so, then why, when the Supreme Court found that Bush had to either prosecute them under US Criminal Codes or try them as prisoners of war, did Bush then say that such a ruling would not allow them to interrogate the prisoners the way they had, and they would be unable to get the vital information they had been getting in order to save American lives?

See our audio files for more on it, and listen to Senator Bill "RINO" Frist try to explain why he cannot give details of the interrogation agreement which was sold to us as an agreement on details!

One may also want to listen to Bill Clinton tell Chris Wallace how angry he was for being sanbagged in an interview. Clinton is a deft liar, ask the people who voted for him. Better yet, ask Debbie Schlussel, of www.debbiedoespolitics.com!

The sound of his argument with Chris Wallace is stunning, and almost as enlightening as the truly valuable information provided by Tony Blankley, editorial page editor of the "Washington Times", and author of "The West's Last Chance".