My Brother is heading up Tax Resistence in Iowa

User offline. Last seen 12 years 21 weeks ago.
evil muppet
Number 465
Conspirator for: 16 years 7 weeks
Posted on: February 14, 2009 - 2:22pm

of course I am doing quite a bit back here in NH.

CEDAR RAPIDS – Cedar Rapids city and community leaders are asking voters to approve a one-cent local option sales tax on March 3rd.

Ninety percent of the revenue from that tax would go toward flood relief. If it passes, the five year tax would generate $29 million a year in all of Linn County.

However, a new grassroots organization opposes the idea and says people are already taxed enough.

Tim Pugh created a group called CR Tea Party after he learned Cedar Rapids wanted to pass a local option sales tax.

"I think it will do more harm than good,” he said.

Pugh and people like Jeremy Cobert oppose any new taxes to pay for flood recovery.

"I haven't seen the budget. But, you have to start by showing the constituents that you have some initiative to cut spending. I haven't seen it and that's led me to not trust where this money will go,” Cobert said.

Pugh said, "If they freeze everything, cut a lot of the waste, cut the budget back some, they can easily generate this much money, if not more."

The group also argues the city’s plans to raise property taxes and utility rates will burden taxpayers enough.

Yet, hundreds of homes hit by the flood have become nothing but empty shells. City and community leaders say residents need to help pay for the rebuilding process. The Tea Party group disagrees.

"I've had enough taxes. I can't afford any more,” Cobert said.

Whether you agree with the new tax or not, everyone knows someone has to pay for the clean-up. The longer everyone debates who will pay the bills, the harder it will be to move forward.

Just last week, we told you about another grassroots group called "Vote Yes for Our Neighbors."

The "Vote Yes" group endorses the tax and has the support of many city and community leaders and organizations.

 

http://www.kcrg.com/news/local/39533792.html


User offline. Last seen 14 years 3 weeks ago.
MacFall
Number 306
MacFall's picture
Conspirator for: 16 years 26 weeks
Posted on: February 18, 2009 - 10:40pm #1

Wow, that article is totally objective.

No, wait - the other thing. Biased.

"Whether you agree with the new tax or not, everyone knows someone has to pay for the clean-up. The longer everyone debates who will pay the bills, the harder it will be to move forward."

In other words, "stop complaining and let the government rob you, we've got STUFF to do".

__________________

Government is not a necessary evil. Rather, it is an evil of such great power that it has been able to convince us of its necessity.


User offline. Last seen 9 years 51 weeks ago.
FUR3jr
Number 468
FUR3jr's picture
Conspirator for: 16 years 6 weeks
Posted on: February 19, 2009 - 3:23pm #2

I love the way you summed that up MacFall.  You've gotten to the crux of the piece, and pointed out it's bias very succinctly.  I had read the piece, and not even picked up on it before you pointed it out.