Gards talk with Ziggy

User offline. Last seen 14 years 21 weeks ago.
Parkinson1963
Number 706
Conspirator for: 14 years 31 weeks
Posted on: April 23, 2010 - 10:24am

Gard in his talk with Ziggy stated that we should not keep any cultural heritage sites unless preserved by the citizens not the Government.

 

I therefore propose that the Liberty Bell in Philadelphia be sold for Scrap.

 

It is worth about $3500 as scrap and must cost thousands per year in up keep, so scrap it.

 

I mean it is just a lump of metal and hold no significant cultural heritage.

 

IF the citizen want to preserve it then they should step up.

 

Culture can only advance by destroying the past.  (Mao)


User offline. Last seen 11 years 14 weeks ago.
Number 5150
Number 100
Conspirator for: 17 years 25 weeks
Posted on: April 23, 2010 - 1:19pm #1

That’s one approach, I guess, but I didn’t take Gard’s point to be that there’s no such thing as cultural heritage – or that the only choice is between government management of cultural sites on the one hand versus destruction of those sites on the other.  Rather it seemed to me the point was that, to the degree people value certain sites or artifacts as culturally significant, they can express that valuation through their own voluntary choices and interactions in the free market.  

That being said, if you do ever find yourself in a position to sell the Liberty Bell, let me know.  I’d be more than happy to pay $3500 for the item, because I recognize that it does have cultural significance.  Ownership of the Bell would be a gold mine for me.  I could easily charge admission to visitors (whatever price the market would bear), and I would be willing to risk my own capital because I suspect the revenue generated from tourists would greatly exceed the cost of my initial investment.  I would therefore have a financial incentive to maintain the Bell in good condition.  In addition, if I were to own it privately, only those people who actually desired to see it would have to pay anything for its preservation.  Those who don’t care one way or the other wouldn’t have their money taken from them by force to preserve an item they didn’t value.

__________________

- Stephen M. Smith


User offline. Last seen 12 years 31 weeks ago.
ziggy_encaoua
Number 531
Conspirator for: 15 years 45 weeks
Posted on: April 23, 2010 - 2:16pm #2

Parkinson1963 wrote:

Gard in his talk with Ziggy stated that we should not keep any cultural heritage sites unless preserved by the citizens not the Government.

 

I therefore propose that the Liberty Bell in Philadelphia be sold for Scrap.

 

Alternatively a charity or trust in the private sector could buy & preserve it

 


User offline. Last seen 14 years 17 weeks ago.
Number10980
Number 614
Conspirator for: 15 years 13 weeks
Posted on: April 23, 2010 - 8:10pm #3

NY is shutting down many of its parks and historical sites and I would rather see them in the hands of private owners instead of the State.