Judd Gregg says he might disagree with her, but she is qualified.

First, we should note that Gregg is FAR from a Constitutionalist in ANY WAY WHATSOEVER. But one might ask him, "Judd, if a person shows that he or she is philosophically antagonistic to the US Constitution, that he or she is an enemy of the Constitution, how can he or she be QUALIFIED to become a Justice assigned to uphold that Constitution and fight its enemies?"

Just wondering.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090805/ap_on_go_su_co/us_sotomayor_senate;_...